Published Semimonthly By

WATCH TOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOCIETY 117 Adams Street -   - Brooklyn 1, N.Y., U.S.A.

Officers

N. H. Knorr, President W. E. Van Amburgh, Secretary “And all thy children shall be taught of Jehovah; and great shall be the peace of thy children.” - haiah 54:13.

THE SCRIPTURES CLEARLY TEACH

THAT JEHOVAH is the only true God and is from everlasting to everlasting, the Maker of heaven and earth and the Giver of life to his creatures; that the Logos was the beginning of his creation, and his active agent in the creation of all other things, and is now the Lord Jesus Christ in glory, clothed with all power in heaven and earth, as the Chief Executive Officer of Jehovah;

THAT GOD created the earth for man, created perfect man for the earth and placed him upon it; that man willfully disobeyed God’s law and was sentenced to death; that by reason of Adam’s wrong act all men are born sinners and without the right to life;

THAT THE LOGOS was made human as the man Jesus and suffered death in order to produce the ransom or redemptive price for obedient ones of mankind; that God raised up Jesus divine and exalted him to heaven above every other creature and above every creature’s name and clothed him with all power and authority';

THAT GOD’S CAPITAL ORGANIZATION is a Theocracy called Zion, and that Christ Jesus is the Chief Officer thereof and is the rightful King of the world; that the anointed and faithful followers of Christ Jesus are children of Zion, members of Jehovah’s organization, and are his witnesses whose duty and privilege it is to testify to the supremacy of Jehovah, declare his purposes toward mankind as expressed in the Bible, and to bear the fruits of the Kingdom before all who will hear;

THAT THE OLD WORLD ended in A. D. 1914, and the Lord Jesus Christ has been placed by Jehovah upon his throne of authority, has ousted Satan from heaven and is proceeding to the establishment of the ‘‘new earth” of the New World;

THAT THE RELIEF and blessings of the peoples of earth can come only by and through Jehovah’s kingdom under Christ, which has now begun; that the Lord’s next great act is the destruction of Satan’s organization and the complete establishment of righteousness in the earth, and that under the Kingdom the people of good-will that survive Armageddon shall carry out the divine mandate to “fill the earth" with a righteous race.

ITS MISSION

THIS journal is published for the purpose of enabling the people to know Jehovah God and his purposes as expressed in the Bible. It publishes Bible instruction specifically designed to aid Jehovah’s witnesses and all people of good-will. It arranges systematic Bible study for its readers and the Society supplies other literature to aid in such studies. It publishes suitable material for radio broadcasting and for other means of public instruction in the Scriptures.

It adheres strictly to the Bible as authority for its utterances. It is entirely free and separate from all religion, parties, sects or other worldly organizations. It is wholly and without reservation for the kingdom of Jehovah God under Christ his beloved King. It is not dogmatic, but invites careful and critical examination of its contents in the light of the Scriptures. It does not indulge in controversy, and its columns are not open to personalities.

YKAKLT SUBSCRIPTION Psics

United States, *1.00; all other countries, *1.SO, American currency; Gbsat Britain, Australasia, and South Arnica, 6s. American remittances should be made by Postal or Express Money Order or by Bank Draft. British, South African and Australasian remittances should be mode direct to the respective braneb offices. Remittances from countries other than those mentioned may be made to the Brooklyn office, but by International Postal Money Order only.

Fobbion OrncEs

British ............34 Craven Terrace, London, W. 2, England

Aaatrolasiun 7 Beresford Road, Strathfield, N. S. W„ Australia

Booth African Boston House, Cape Town, South Africa

Indian                  ........ ..._____ 167 Love Lane, Bombay 27. India

Please address the Society in every case.

Translations of this journal appear in several languages.

ALL SINCERE STUDENTS OF THE BIBLE who by reason of Infirmity, poverty or adversity are unable to pay the subscription price may have The Watchtower free upon written application to the publishers, made once each year, stating the reason for so requesting It We are fjad to thus aid the needy, but the written application once each years required by the postal regulations.

Notice to Subscribers: Acknowledgment of a new or a renewal subscription will be sent only when requested. Change of address, when requested, may be expected to appear on address label within one month. A renewal blank (carrying notice of expiration) will be sent with the journal one month before the subscription expires.

Printed in the United States of America

Entered as second-class matter at the poet office at Brooklyn, N. Y„ under the Act of March S, ISIS.

“FREEDOM OF WORSHIP” TESTIMONY PERIOD

April is the month of the Testimony Period so named. This period concludes the three-month campaign in behalf of the subscription list of The Watchtower. Hence those jealously guarding as well as faithfully exercising the freedom of worship will contmue their earnest efforts to secure new subscriptions for this journal of God-given freedom. A new feature of the campaign is added by the release this month of the booklet The Coming World Regeneration, and this, together with the book “The Truth Shall Make You Free”, will be offered as a premium to everyone giving a year’s subscription, at no more than the regular rate of $1.00. Our efforts are having God’s blessing, and co-operation by all our regular subscribers and all other believers in freedom of worship will be welcomed durmg the remainder of this campaign. Requests by all such for instructions will be gladly received and given prompt' attention.

MEMORIAL

The date Scripturally arrived at for 1944 for celebrating the Memorial is Saturday, April 8. After 6 p. m. that day each company should assemble, and the anointed ones thereof celebrate the Memorial, their companions as the Lord’s “other sheep” being present as observers. Before the partaking of the Memorial emblems a competent brother may deliver a brief discourse or appropriate paragraphs may be read from Watchtower articles on the Memorial to those assembled. The bread-breaking and wine-dnnking both picturing the death in which Christ’s body-members partake, both emblems should be served together at partakmg. namely, unleavened bread and red wine. Jesus and his apostles most certamly used red wine in symbol of his blood, and wc should follow their lead. Report your celebration, the total attendance and partakers of the emblems to the Society, as instructed also in the Informant.

“THE COMING WORLD REGENERATION”

It is gratifying to announce the production of a new booklet of the above title. Its thirty-two pages set out the public address delivered by the Society’s president to large audiences at various assemblies in the United States and Cuba. The speech gives for the first time, by the Lord’s grace, the full scope of the glorious regeneration promised in His Word, and the front-cover design artistically suggests this great event. Copies of The Coming World Regeneration are now available, at 5c a copy. Read it and prepare for its coming distribution, as detailed elsewhere.

“WATCHTOWER” STUDIES

Week of April 23; “The Firstfruits of Resurrection,” fl 1-21 inclusive, The Watchtower March 15, 1944.

Week of April 30: “The Firstfruits of Resurrection,” fl 22-41 inclusive, The Watchtower March 15, 1944.

ANNOUNCING JEHOVAH’S KINGDOM

Vol. LXV                                   March 15, 1944                                      No. 6

THE FIRSTFRUITS OF RESURRECTION

"I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come: that Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead."—Acts 26:22,23.

TEHOVAH’S truth concerning His purposes and I man’s destiny differs radically from all religion.

J Sacred truth is not a religion. In no way can this be better seen than by comparing the truth with the teachings of religion. “Thy word is true from the beginning,’’ said the adoring psalmist to Jehovah God. Centuries later the One of whom the psalmist was a prototype added: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (Ps. 119: 160; John 17:17) Therefore it is certain that the Holy Bible is not a book of religion. It has nothing in common with religion, although religion has all along endeavored to mix some of the Bible with itself in order to take on an appearance of truth. Religion, however, cannot adopt the whole Bible, because the two are irreconcilable foes.

• ² Religion shuns to face the truth regarding the dead and the hope of future life, which truth the Bible sets forthwith understandable plainness. Early in man’s existence religion was introduced to man to answer the issue of death and to pervert the truth concerning the state of the dead. The Creator, who brought man to life, was the first to mention to man the matter of death. The prospect of everlasting life on earth which the Creator set before the perfect man was not life through the so-called “portals of death", but by continual obedience to his Maker. (Gen. 2:16,17) The Devil, through the serpent in Eden, denied the divine law and its penalty to the man’s wife, and held forth another hope before mankind, at the price of disobeying God. Human disobedience followed, and God sentenced the disobedient to destruction.—Gen. 3: 1-21.

• ³ Only from the religious words of contradiction to God could the sentenced man and woman draw any expectation of not really dying, but of living on as gods, as spirits, just as God is a spirit. Those who were due to pass out of existence would want to believe that death did not end all, and that the ser-

• 1 Why is not the Bible a book of religion*

• 2 Why and how was religion first introduced to man*

• 3 . In the Serpent’s religious words what was pionn-ed to man, and therefore in what fundamental respect does religion differ from God's Word of truth’* pent possibly spoke true: “Ye shall not surely die: . . . and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:4,5) In such religious words was the promise of never dying, even by those disobeying God. That spelled deatblessness, immortality, in the religious view of things. It meant that, even if Jehovah God executed his sentence of death by the dissolving of their fleshly body to the dust, yet his decree of destruction would be defeated by the survival of an intelligent, living spark within sinner man after the crumbling of the body in death. Such view of human immortality, as based on Satan the Devil’s lie. is the view that is held to by all religious organizations of “Christendom" and "heathendom” to this day. In this fundamental respect religion differs from the Word of truth; for the inspired Bible nowhere teaches human immortality, but that the dead are altogether lifeless, out of existence. The truth-speaking psalmist said to the Creator: “From everlasting to everlasting, thou art God. Thou turnest man to destruction; and sayest. Return [to the dust], ye children of men.” (Ps. 90:2,3) In all the pre-Christian Hebrew Scriptures the words immortality and incorruption occur not once.

HOPE AND UNBELIEF

• ⁴ Contrary to religion's doctrine of human immortality, the first and real basis for life hevond death was laid in the Son of God, vho died as a man and then attained to life beyond the grave. That the first opportunity to immortality (not human immortality, however) was then opened up, it is written in the Word of truth: “God . . . hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began, but is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality [incorruption] to light through the gospel.”

• 4 When was the basis for life beyond the grave truly laid, and where is such hope set foith?

(2 Tim. 1:8-10) Christ Jesus is the Seed of God’s “woman”, which Seed is appointed to bruise the head of the serpent, Satan the Devil, and to destroy all religion with him. (Gen. 3:15) It is through Christ’s suffering the bruising of the heel and yet proving faithful and true to Jehovah God, even to the death, that he has brought the hope of eternal life and of immortality or incorruption to the true light of day. Such hope is set forth, not in the many religions, but in the gospel, or “good news”, of God's kingdom through his Son Jesus Christ.

• ⁵ What, then, was the hope of the faithful men who received and believed the truths Jehovah God was pleased to reveal before Christ! It was not a hope of human immortality and of an unbroken continuance of living beyond the grave by reason of some supposed immortality of the soul. Theirs was the hope of future life by virtue of the lifting of the condemnation of sin and by a resurrection from the dead. Concerning the patriarch Abraham, and the testing of his faith in God’s truthfulness and power, it is written: “By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac; and he that had received the promises, offered up his only begotten son, of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called: accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.”—Heb. 11:17-19.

^e Under prophetic inspiration the psalmist David wrote: “For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. Thou wilt shew me the path of life.” (Ps. 16:10,11) Such phrase expressed faith in the power and purpose of Jehovah God to restore the worthy One to life. (Verse 3) After David the prophet Isaiah, inspired by the spirit of truth, enlarged on God's purpose, saying: “He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord God will wipe away tears from off all faces.” (Isa. 25: 8) There was another expression of faith in the resurrection of dead ones. (1 Cor. 15: 51-54; Acts 13: 33-37) The Holy Bible, containing those prophecies, stands alone as the book which not only does not teach the immortality of the human soul but does teach also, in harmony with human mortality, the resurrection of the dead.

' Therein lies a key difference between religion and the truth. Religion teaches life after death by an imagined immortality of the human soul. Directly opposite, the written Word of God points to the mortality of the human soul or creature and the necessity for the resurrection of the dead by Jehovah’s power. Naturally the Greek religionists at

• 6 What, then, was the hope of faithful men of old as Illustrated in Abraham ?

• 6 What did David and Isaiah sneak foretelling faith In a resurrection? and how, therefore, does the Bible stand alone from other books?

• 7 What, then, is a key difference between religion and the truth? and how was this forcibly shown by Paul's experience at Athens?

Athens who believed in human immortality and hence in no resurrection said respecting the apostle Paul: “He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the Resurrection [Anastasis].” Paul ended up his speech to those religionists, saying: “Because [God] hath appointed a day in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.” “And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.”—Acts 17: IS, 31, 32.

’ Religionists could swallow whole the impossible doctrine of the inherent immortality of man's soul, contrary to the plain word of God; but when it came to the Scriptural truth of the resurrection it was needful for Paul to ask a religionist: “Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?” One was considered by some religionists to be mad for arguing for the resurrection, as in Paul’s case after he declared Jesus’ resurrection. “And as he thus spake for himself, Festus said with a loud voice, Paul, thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad.” (Acts 26: 8, 24) Modern religionists, forced to admit that God's Word teaches resurrection of the dead, mix Bible with religion by trying to tie the resurrection in with the Devil doctrine of human immortality; how? By claiming that at the resurrection the body in which the sinner died will be united again with an immortal soul that departed from the body at death. But such doctrines cannot mix, any more than the Bible and religion, because where there are immortals and no dead ones, there can be and need be no resurrection of any out of death. The very doctrine of the “resurrection of the dead” is proof of the Bible teaching that the dead are non-existent and that human immortality is a religious lie.

THE FIRST RESURRECTION FORESHADOWED

’ The first resurrection to take place was foreshadowed by the restoring of Abraham’s son Isaac from the altar of sacrifice. Besides that, the Almighty God had a yearly picture of this same resurrection enacted by the descendants of Abraham and Isaac namely, the nation of Israel. Israel was the new name of Abraham’s grandson Jacob, from whom came forth the twelve tribes of Israel. The annual resurrection picture was carried out by such Israelites in the land of Palestine on the sixteenth day of Abib or Nisan, the first month of the year as ordained by Jehovah God.—Ex. 12:2; 13:4.

• 8. How further was this difference shown during Paul a appearance before Festus? and, because the Bible tenches resurrection, what do modern religionists seek to do, and bow so’

• 9. How, when, and among whom was the first resurrection to take place foreshadowed’

• ¹⁰ It came about in this manner: For 215 years the twelve tribes of Israel sojourned in the land of Egypt, where, in course of time, the mighty Pharaoh of the land enslaved them. In his appointed year Jehovah God broke their bonds, on the fourteenth day of Abib or Nisan, which day was the passover day. That day in Egypt the Israelites under God’s prophet Moses obeyed God’s command and sacrificed the passover lamb, one lamb to each Israelite household. They sprinkled the lamb’s blood on the doorposts and lintels of their homes and retired within for the night. Then they roasted the lamb and partook of it with unleavened bread and bitter herbs, at the same time standing prepared to move out of their land of bondage. At midnight of Nisan 14 Jehovah’s angel of death passed over the blood-marked homes of the Israelites but smote the firstborn of all the homes and stalls of the Egyptians. Pharaoh, losing his own firstborn son, and being under irresistible pressure by all the bereaved Egyptians, yielded to Jehovah's demand and let His people go forth a free nation. The Israelites were now God’s covenant people, being brought into the covenant with him through Moses as mediator and over the blood of the passover lamb as the validating means.

• ¹¹ Jehovah God thereafter gave them the laws of the covenant. He decreed that his people should celebrate Jehovah’s deliverance of them by celebrating the passover supper regularly on its anniversary. The passover day must then be followed by a sevenday feast of unleavened bread, from Abib (or Nisan) 15-21 inclusive. The covenant law concerning such feast reads:

¹³ “These are the feasts of the Lord, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the Lord’s passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the Lord: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. In the first day [Nisan 15] ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein [it being therefore a special sabbath day]. But ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the Lord seven days: in the seventh day is an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come into the land which I give unto you, and shall reap the harvest thereof, then ye shall bring a sheaf [(Hebrew) an omer, or a handful] of the first-fruits of your harvest unto the priest: and he shall wave the sheaf [omer] before the Lord, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath

10 As a preliminary thereto, how did the passover come about and how were the Israelites brought into the law covenant with Jehovah? 11, In the laws of the covenant, what did Jehovah decree regarding the passover and what should immediately follow?

• 12. what did his law state concerning such, and particularly the flrstfruits to be offered?

[of Nisan 15] the priest shall wave it. And ye shall offer that day [Nisan 16] when ye wave the sheaf an he lamb without blemish of the first year for a burnt offering unto the Lord. And the meat [meal] offering thereof shall be two tenth deals of fine flour mingled with oil, an offering made by fire unto the Lord for a sweet savour: and the drink offering thereof shall be of wine, the fourth part of an hin [liquid measure].”—Lev. 23:4-13.

• ¹³ The Lord God declared that the next feast in order was to be calculated from that flrstfruits day, Abib or Nisan 16. The law of his covenant with the Israelites reads: "And ye shall eat neither bread, nor parched corn, nor green ears, until the selfsame day that ye have brought an offering [the flrstfruits] unto your God: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations in all your dwellings. And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day [Nisan 16] that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat [meal] offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals: they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the flrstfruits unto the Lord. And ye shall offer with the bread seven lambs without blemish of the first year, and one young bullock, and two rams: they shall be for a burnt offering unto the Lord, with their meat offering, and their drink offerings, even an offering made by fire, of sweet savour unto the Lord. Then ye shall sacrifice one kid of the goats for a sin offering, and two lambs of the first year for a sacrifice of peace offerings. And the priest shall wave them with the bread of the flrstfruits for a wave offering before the Lord, with the two lambs: they shall be holy to the Lord for the priest. And ye shall proclaim on the selfsame [fiftieth or Pentecostal] day, that it may be an holy convocation unto you: ye shall do no servile work therein: it shall be a statute for ever in all your dwellings throughout vour generations.” —Lev. 23:14-21.

• ¹⁴ The above feast came to be known as the feast of Pentecost, because of the number of the day upon which celebrated. In the numbering, please note that the expression “seven sabbaths” means “seven weeks”, and the “seventh sabbath” means the “seventh week”, the term “sabbath” being thus used to mean, not a restday, but a week. Hence Pentecost was also called “the feast of weeks”. (Compare Deuteronomy 16:9,10.) At a number of places in the inspired Scriptures after Christ the term “sabbath” is used meaning a “week”.—Matt. 28:1; Mark 16: 2; Luke

• 13. Wbat was to be the next annual feast thereafter, and what did God's law say concerning it?

• 14. Wbat, therefore, did this feast come to be called? and bow la the term “sabbath” used in the law concerning such feast?

18:12; 24:1; John 20:1,19; Acts 20: 7; 1 Cor. 16: 2, Roth.

” Instructions were also given by the Lord for the celebration of a third feast in the year, on the fifteenth day of the seventh month, and called “the feast of tabernacles”, the “feast of ingathering”, or the “feast of harvest”. (Lev. 23:33-44) All such feasts are important to study, for Jehovah God ordained them in his covenant because they were 'shadows of good things to come’. Hence they were not religious celebrations to mystify his people and to glorify the priests and Levites carrying on the performance. (Heb. 8:5; 10:1; Col. 2:16,17) By the regular observance of such significant feasts his faithful people would be prepared to recognize God’s works when he would cause the fulfillments of those prophetic shadows, and so they would not be misguided by religion. In fact, the law covenant was made with the nation of Israel for the express purpose of protecting them from religion and its deathdealing errors and bondage till Christ Jesus should come and begin a new covenant. Galatians 3; 19 so states, saying: “Wherefore then serveth the law! It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it [the law covenant] was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator [Moses].”

FIRSTFRUITS IDENTIFIED

• ¹⁸ The passover lamb is unmistakably identified as to its symbolical meaning. The Word of inspiration declares: “For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: therefore let us keep the feast.” (1 Cor. 5: 7, 8) This fact required that Christ Jesus match the passover shadow in a number of outline details, among which was the day of the month on which he should be sacrificed as “the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world”. In an equally certain manner is made plain for us the symbolic meaning of the sheaf or omer of the first-fruits of the barley harvest that was waved by the priest at Jerusalem’s temple on Nisan 16, the third day from the passover. Again the Word of divine interpretation says: “But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the first-fruits ; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.” (1 Cor. 15: 20-23) This fact made it necessary that Christ Jesus match the shadow as to the month and day of the month on which he should be raised

• 19 . (a) What third annual feast did God’s law ordain, and why la It important to study such feasts? (b) Why would observing such feasts be beneficial, and for what express purpose was the law given to Israel? 16. How do the Scriptures identify the antitypes of the passover lamb and of the firstfruits offering, and what did such types require in the case of the fulfillment thereof? from the dead by the power of God, who ordained the shadow. It also required that Christ Jesus, having suffered as the antitypical passover Lamb unto death, “should be the first that should rise from the dead” and that he should be “the firstborn from the dead” or “firstbegotten of the dead”.—Acts 26: 23; Col. 1:18; Rev. 1: 5.

” Did the Son of God vindicate God’s Word as true by meeting the time requirements here set by the great Shadow-thrower, Jehovah God! He did. However, in a publication entitled “144 Self-Contradictions of the Bible” a society of infidels endeavor to prove that the Word of God contradicts itself on the vital point of the time when Christ Jesus was raised from the dead. A number of religionists, in trying to meet such infidel argument, serve only to stir up more confusion. Christ Jesus, say the unbelievers or infidels, “was to be three days and three nights in the grave,” whereas the Bible shows he “was but two days and two nights in the grave”; and they quote Jesus’ words at Matthew 12:40 as contradicting Mark 15: 25, 42-46; 16: 9. The religionists, for their part, do not permit the Bible to supply its own explanation, but lean to their own understanding. Consequently, even though undesigned! y, their arguments inject further apparent contradiction into God’s Word, whereas none actually exists at all.

¹⁸ For the vindication of God's Word as true, and as being of One who “cannot deny himself^-’ and “cannot lie”, let us permit these seeming difficulties to resolve themselves. The Bible contains many prophetic dramas which forecast the works of God and the career of his Christ and the followers of Christ Jesus. Among such is the drama of the Jewish prophet named Jonah. This drama is of special interest to us who are unquestionably at the end of the world of wickedness and at the beginning of the new world of everlasting righteousness. As it is stated at 1 Corinthians 10:11: “Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.” The Lord Jesus particularly showed that Jonah’s career was a drama of prophetic scenes, when he referred to Jonah 1:17, which reads: “Now the Lord [Jehovah] had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.”

¹⁸ The infidels argue that this means that Jonah must be three full days or a period of exactly 72 hours in the belly of the whale. But does God’s Record, by its form of expression, require that Jonah 17. Did Christ Jeans meet such time requirements? and bow do the infidels and religious seek to bring contradiction and confusion Into the matter?

18. By what can these seeming difficulties resolve themselves, and why is the prophetic drama of Jonah now of special Interest to us* 19. What do infidels argue concerning Jonah’s time spent within the whale, but what does the record concerning Joseph's putting of his ten half brothers in ward show as to like time-expressions? be there three literal nights and at least 72 hours before it was that “the Lord spake unto the fish, and it vomited out Jonah upon the dry land”! Scrutiny of other occurrences of like time-expressions answers No! When Joseph’s ten half brothers came down to Egypt to buy foodstuffs during the famine, Joseph, unrecognized by them, accused them of being spies, to put them to a test. The Record reads: “He put them all together into ward three days.” Did that mean or require they be kept in ward three full days, equaling a 72-hour period? No; for the Bible interprets the time period for us, saying that “Joseph said unto them the third day, This do, and live; for I fear God,” and then he let them out. (Gen. 42:17,18) In other words, on the first day he arrested them, and on the third day he released them; which fact allowed them to be actually in ward but two nights, and only parts of three days; even though in Egypt the 24-hour day was counted as starting at sunrise. Joseph loosed them before nightfall of the third day.—See also Genesis 40:12,13, 18-20 and compare the expressions “three days" and “third day”.

• ²⁰ Another instance of this measurement of time is found in the account concerning Solomon’s successor, King Rehoboam of Jerusalem. At 2 Chronicles 10: 5 it states: “And he said unto them. Come again unto me after three days. And the people departed.” According to the infidels this should mean that the king ordered them not to return until after 72 hours (or three 24-hour periods) had passed; which would not allow them to appear again in king's court before the fourth day. But God's Word interprets the king’s time-assignment otherwise, saying, at verse 12: “So Jeroboam and all the people came to Rehoboam on the third day [not on the fourth day], as the king bade, saying, Come again to me on the third day.” The day upon which the king issued the order was the first day, the next day was the second, and the next succeeding day was the third day, upon which day, before it expired at sundown, the Israelites returned to the king.—See also 1 Kings 12: 5,12.

• ²¹ Centuries later the Jews throughout the Persian empire were threatened with death by the king’s decree as framed by his vizier Haman. What did the king’s Jewish queen instruct her cousin to do? “Then Esther bade them return Mordecai this answer, Go, gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days, night or day: I also and my maidens will fast likewise; and so will I go in unto the king, which is not according to the law: and if I perish, I perish.” (Esther 4:15,16) Does God’s Word warrant us in taking Esther’s instruc-

20 What like construction upon time-measurement w there In the case of King Rehoboam and the people under Jeroboam⁷

21 What parallel construction upon a three-day period was shown In the case of Queen Esther? tion to mean literally three 12-hour days and three 12-hour nights, or a total period of 72 hours of fasting, after which, on the fourth day, she would appear uninvited in the king’s court? Regardless of what infidels or religionists may argue to the contrary, the record at Esther 5:1 answers No, saying: “Now it came to pass on the third day, that Esther put on her royal apparel, and stood in the inner court of the king’s house, over against the king's house: and the king sat upon his royal throne in the royal house, over against the gate of the house.” Also compare the expressions “third day” and “three days and three nights” and “three days agone” at 1 Samuel 30:1,11-14, to note Hebrew time-calculations.

HOW LONG?

¹² On one reported occasion Jesus said: “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” (Matt. 12: 40; see also Matthew 16:4; Luke 11:30) Ignoring the evidence given in the above foregoing paragraphs, certain religionists as well as infidels insist that Jesus meant he would be three night periods as well as day periods in the sepulcher, or an even 72 hours. On such grounds the religionists reckon back three full days from Saturday evening, when the Jewish first day of the week began and on which first day Jesus appeared to his disciples. Then they conclude that Christ Jesus was crucified on Wednesday and died at 3 p. m. and was buried before sundown. For their support they quote Mark 8:31, which reads: “And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.” (See also Mark 9:31; 10:34, Am. Stan. Ver.) But that the expression “after three days” does not mean after 72 hours but refers to an event or action on the third day before the day- expires, Scriptural proof has been given in our preceding paragraphs. For further proof compare Joshua 1:11; 2:16, 22; 3: 2; 9: 16,17, and the interlocking expressions “within three days”, “there three days,” “after three days,” “at the end of three days,” and “the third day”. Study also 1 Samuel 20: 5,18,19. 27, 34, 35, and the related timedesignations, “unto the third day,” “three days,” and “second day of the month” and “in the morning”.

” It is of no force to quote the words of Jesus’ enemies to Pilate: “Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again”; for the enemies added: “Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure 22 (a) What did Jesus say concerning his fulfillment of the Jonah-type? <b) How do religionists therefore argue as to the day he died¹ and what above evidence shows they miscalculate the time¹

23 Why do the testimony and the ridicule of Jesus' enemies not favor the religionists' time-calculation? and bow was Jesus' statement at John 2:19-22 concerning three days fulfilled? until the third day, lest his disciples come by night and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead.” (Matt. 27: 63, 64) At the trial the false witnesses against Jesus testified: “We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands.” Also while he was hanging on the tree his enemies passed by and said: “Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself.” (Mark 14: 58; 15: 29, 30; Matt. 27: 40; 26: 61) Such testimony and ridicule doubtless refer to what is recorded at John 2: 19-22: “Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them.” And, indeed, on the third day Christ Jesus, as the Head of the spiritual temple of God which is not made with human hands, was raised from the dead. Then he proceeded to build up those who should be the members of his body, the ‘"body of Christ”, namely, his disciples, then scattered, confused and dejected.—1 Cor. 3:16,17, margin.

“ Wisdom’s way is to let the Scriptures deal with the expression “after three days” and explain it. Nowhere do they interpret it to mean “after 72 hours” or “on the fourth day”. Jesus, as quoted by the other Gospel writers, explains the expression used in Mark’s account. “Jesus said unto them, The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men: and they shall liill him, and the third day he shall be raised again.” (Matt. 17:22,23; also 20:18,19; 16: 21; Luke 9: 22; 18: 32, 33) To King Herod Jesus sent this message: “Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures today and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.” (Luke 13: 32) That the close disciples of Jesus so counted the time is evident from comment made by the two disciples on the way to Emmaus, when Jesus met them on his resurrection day. Not recognizing their risen Master, they said to him: “The chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.” (Luke 24: 13-21) They counted the time from his crucifixion, not from his burial or the placing of the guard at the tomb, which burial and guard they did not mention or had not witnessed. That they had reckoned the time correctly as the third day since the crucifixion, Jesus confirmed when he appeared

• 24. (a) How did Jesus explain the expression “after three dars'¹ accord* ing to ^vhat he said to bis disciples and to Kins Herod⁹ (b) How did the two disciples eo route to Emmaus on resurrection day calculate the rime, and how did Jesus confirm it that same day? shortly after to his disciples in Jerusalem on the same day and said to them: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day.”—Luke 24: 33-46.

” Several years later the apostle Peter testified to the first Gentile converts, Cornelius and his household: “We are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: him God raised up the third day, and shewed him openly.” And the apostle Paul, who miraculously saw the Lord’s glory after Jesus’ ascension to heaven, writes: “That Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.” (Acts 10 : 39,40; 1 Cor. 15:3,4) The accounts in the Gospels must therefore be understood and explained on the basis of a third-day resurrection. The Scriptures do not agree with the contention that He died late on Wednesday afternoon and was resurrected late in the afternoon of the following Saturday, or on the seventh day of the Jewish week.

” Contenders for the Lord’s death as on a Wednesday afternoon also reason that the last supper which the Lord ate with his disciples before his betrayal and arrest was not the passover supper, but was an ordinary private meal, after which he instituted the Memorial of Christ’s death, on Tuesday evening. The statement at John 18:28 has been variously understood, by some to mean that Jesus did not eat the passover at all with his disciples, and by others to mean that Jesus did eat the passover, but by anticipation, that is, a day ahead, in order not to miss observing it before his death and in order to institute the Memorial or “Lord's supper” at the close of the passover supper. Such action cannot rightly be attributed to Christ Jesus, for he declared that the Scriptures must be fulfilled and that he came not to destroy but to fulfill the prophetic shadows of the law covenant. (Matt. 5: 17-19) Hence it is Scripturally impossible to think that he broke his Father’s commandment as to eating the passover and failed to fulfill the type of the passover lamb’s death by dying ahead of the due time by one day. Matthew 26:17-30 and Mark 14:16-26 and Luke 22: 13-30 are very plain that Jesus did celebrate the passover in his capacity as a Jew after the flesh, and that he observed it on the evening of the proper date, Nisan 14, and thereafter introduced the Memorial.

• ²⁷ John 13:1,2 does not disagree, which reads: “Now before the feast of the passover, when Jesus

• 2S. Years later wbat did Peter and Paul sav as to the resurrection day? and on what basis, therefore must the Gospel-accounts statements concerning the day be understood?

26 How has John 13 • 23 been variously understood concerning Jesus* last supper and death, and why is it Scripturally impossible to agree with such understandings?

• 27. (a) Why does John 13:1. 2 not disagree with the fact that it was the passover that Jesus then ate? (b) How. then, must John 18:28 be understood in order to harmonize therewith? knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end. And supper being ended, ...” Who can deny that before the passover Jesus knew such facts? The Emphatic Diaglott reading of John 13: 1 makes this very clear: “Now Jesus knowing before the feast of the passover, that his hour was come, that he should depart out of this world to the Father,” etc. But why, then, does John 18:28 say that the Jews leading Jesus captive to Pilate’s judgment hall refused themselves to go “into the judgment hall” of a Gentile, “lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover” thereafter? This must refer to their trying to keep ceremonially clean outwardly, that they might partake of the seven-day feast of unleavened bread that followed and was inseparably connected with the passover. (Deut. 16:2; 2 Chron. 35: 8, Douay) (Some suggest that these high-ranking Jews celebrated the passover a day later than the common Jews. Others suggest, with some proffered “proof”, that due to possible errors of reckoning time the cautious Jews celebrated two passovers to make sure that one of the two days was correct.)

²⁸ The religionists, proceeding on a 72-hour timetable, claim that, Jesus dying on a Wednesday and then appearing on Sunday, two sabbath days intervened: first, the sabbath of the day of convocation that followed the passover and which was the first day of the feast of unleavened bread; and, second, the regular weekly sabbath on Saturday, the seventh weekday, shortly before sundown of which Saturday they say Jesus was raised. However, the Scriptures mention only one sabbath as intervening between Je>us’ death and his resurrection. John 19: 31 reads: “The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.” Since Jesus died before sunset or end of the passover day, his corpse must not be left hanging on the tree during the night, according to Deuteronomy 21:22,23. Hence he was taken down and buried on that same passover day, therefore the first day of his being in the tomb or “heart of the earth”. The second day of his entombment began at sundown. Not merely was that second day the sabbath immediately after the passover day and opening up the feast of unleavened bread, but it was also the weekly sabbath or seventh day. Hence it was “a high day”, due to such coincidence. In other words, Nisan 15, convocation day, fell on the seventh day of the week in A.D. 33. “And the women also, which came with him from Galilee, followed

28 According to the law concerning the feast and also John 19*31, did one or two sabbaths intervene between Jesus' death and resurrection' and lion so?

after, and beheld the sepulchre, and how his body was laid, and they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment.”—Luke 23: 54-56; Mark 15: 42-47; Ex. 20: 8-11.

” Religionists refer to Matthew 28:1, particularly to the Syriac Version thereof, as proof that the Lord’s resurrection occurred on the weekly sabbath day that ended Saturday at sundown, and that the women came to the tomb Saturday after sunset. The Syriac Version reads: “And in the close of the sabbath, as the first [day] of the week began to dawn, came Mary of Magdala and the other Mary, to view the sepulchre.” (Murdock’s translation) In the Greek manuscript text of this verse the words above translated “sabbath” and “week” are the same Greek word, “sabbaton,” in the plural number. Why the different translation of the two occurrences of the same word so close together? Evidently because of misunderstanding. As stated in paragraph 14 above, the Hebrews and the Greeks used the word “sabbath” not merely to mean the sabbath day but, at times, also to mean the whole week. Hence the Rotherham translation of Matthew 28: 1, 2 reads: “And late in the week, when it was on the point of dawning into the first of the week came Mary the Magdalene, and the other Mary, to view the sepulchre. And lo! a great commotion [earthquake] occurred,—for a messenger of the Lord descending out of heaven and coming near had rolled away the stone, and was sitting upon it.” The Emphatic Diaglott is therefore correct in reading: “Now after the Sabbath, as it was dawning to the first day of the week,” etc. Only a violent wresting of the plain Scriptures could twist the account to mean a sabbath resurrection of Jesus.

³⁰ Although Mark 16:9 is not contained in the two oldest Greek manuscripts, it is contained in many other Greek manuscripts and versions, among which is the Syriac Version, which reads: “And in the morning of the first day of the week, he arose; and he appeared first to Mary Magdalena, from whom he had cast out seven demons.” (Murdock) The Emphatic Diaglott reading is: “And having risen early on the first day of the week,” etc. And with this the readings of the American Standard Version, Rotherham, Weymouth, and Moffatt translations all agree. But regardless of whether Mark 16: 9-20 is genuine or not, the Gospel accounts as well as the prophetic shadows written aforetime all combine to prove the Lord’s resurrection on Nisan 16, the day that followed the sabbath after the passover, and which day in A.D. 33 was the first day of the week, now called “Sunday”. To attach the name “Easter”

• 29 . By Matthew 28:1 (especially the Syriac Version thereof), what do religionists try to prtne’ but how should such verse be understood according to the Rotherham and Emphatic Diaglott renderings?

• 30 . (a) How does the Syriac Version rendering of Mark 16*0 agree with the true day of resurrection, and also other versions of that verse? (b) Why is it improper to call It “Easter Sunday*’? to it is heathenish, because “Easter” was a demongoddess worshiped by the pagans, and the one occurrence of the word at Acts 12:4 (A.V.) is an English mistranslation of the word passover; and certainly the pagan religious “Easter” is not the Jewish passover. Neither does the true anniversary of our Lord’s resurrection day fall each year on the same day of the week, Sunday. It shifts, just as the anniversary of the passover and Memorial shifts from one day of the week to another.

• ³¹ Reasonably Jehovah God would demonstrate the fact of Jesus’ resurrection on the same day on which it occurred, and not on the next day. On the next day it could not be proved that he was raised the previous day, no man having seen him and none having visible proof thereof. If he was raised late on Saturday afternoon close to sundown, why would God cause his angel to descend and open the tomb about twelve hours later, Sunday about 6 a.m., if it was to be proved he was raised the day previous? To argue that the angel’s comment, “He is not here; for he is risen,” proves that he was raised the previous day is no valid argument at all. But by God’s opening the tomb on the third day of Jesus’ entombment, such being the first day of the week, and then by Jesus’ manifesting himself to his disciples before such third day expired, there would be the visible and absolute proof of his being raised that day, the first weekday.

• ³² To correspond with Matthew 28:1, the account at John 20:1,2 reads: “The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark [not when it began to grow dark Saturday evening], unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre. Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter,” etc. Let it be noted that the Greek word here translated “early” is translated “in the morning” at Matthew 16:3; 20:1; Mark 1:35; 11: 20; 13:35; 15:1; 16:2; and “morning” at Acts 28:23, reading, “from morning till evening.” There was no Saturday evening visit of disciples to the tomb.

• ³³ The prophecy at Daniel 9:24-27, that Messiah should be “cut off” and “in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease”, has no reference to a week of seven days, but to a week of years, as in Genesis 29: 18-27. The “seventy weeks” predicted to Daniel began in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes, or in 454 B. C. Hence to declare that, if Jesus died on Wednesday, it would agree with the prophecy of the “midst of the week” is without basis. Furthermore, a week of seven days, Jewish time, would reach its midst on Wednesday at 6 a. m., because the Jewish week began at sundown

• 31 . Reasonably, on wbat day would God first demonstrate the fact of Jesus’ resurrection? and why is an argument for bis resurrection the day before his appearing invalid?

• 32 What does John 20 • 1. 2 show as to Matthew 2S: 1 regarding time? 33 Why does the prophecy io Daniel 9 concerning the “seventy weeks” not prove Jesus as baring died late Wednesday afternoon? or 6 p. m. on Saturday. However, Jesus died at the ninth hour of the daylight period, namely, at 3 p. m. —Matt. 27: 46; Mark 15: 34.

³⁴ Any contention for a Saturday resurrection would make that event occur on the fourth day of Jesus’ entombment; for Wednesday before sundown would be the first day of his interment, the second day would begin at Wednesday sundown, the third day would begin at Thursday sundown, and the fourth day would begin at Friday sundown and would extend till Saturday sundown. Hence the next day, or Sunday, would be the fifth day since his death on the tree, whereas the two disciples whom the risen Jesus met on the road to Emmaus mentioned his execution and said: “To day is the third day since these things were done”; and “to day” in their case was the first day of the Jewish week. —Luke 24:1,13-24.

³³ The account at Mark 16:1 states that the faithful women visiting the tomb had bought sweet spices with which to anoint Jesus’ corpse. The record at Luke 23: 56 indicates that they had obtained these before sundown of the day of Jesus' death and burial, and hence before the combination weekly sabbath and postpassover sabbath began. They could also have purchased some extra spices after sunset of Saturday, which would be after that “high day” or double sabbath had passed. Coming to anoint his body on Sunday^ the first day of the week, they would not reasonably choose the fifth day to do so, because of what Martha said to Jesus about her dead brother Lazarus: “Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days.” (John 11: 17, 39) It cannot be Scripturally shown that those women with spices understood Psalm 16:10 and applied it to Jesus, that his human body should not see corruption, and that they would therefore attempt an anointing of him beyond the third day.

³³ Generally religionists claim that it was Jesus’ fleshly body that was raised and taken with him to heaven, contrary to the Scriptures. (1 Cor. 15:50; 1 Pet. 3:18; John 6:51; 2 Cor. 5:16) Were their claim true, then the stone would have to be rolled away from the sepulcher’s door at the time that the resurrection took place in order to let the fleshly body get out. If the resurrection occurred on Saturday just before sundown, then the earthquake must have been at the same time, and the Lord's angel must have then descended and rolled away the sealed stone, to the great terror of the soldiers guarding the sealed tomb. The question then arises: How long

34 Counting from hi* supposed death on Wednesday, wbat day there* from would Saturday be, and also Sunday, contrary to what the disciple* on the way to Emmaus said?

35 According to Mark 16:1. when did the women obtain apices for anointing Jesus' body, and why would an attempt to anoint him the fifth day after a burial be unreasonable and unscripturaP

30 Based on religion’s claim of Jesus’ resurrection in flesh, what further unreasonable difficulties appear as to the sepulcher guards, if be waa raised just before sundown Saturday? did the angel sit upon the stone? All through Saturday night, keeping the terror-stricken guards in a continuous paralysis? Was the sepulcher door open all that time also, without being noticed before the morning or dawn of the “first day”? Matthew 28:1-15 definitely asserts that the earthquake, the angel’s descent and the stone's removal took place early Sunday morning, marking Jesus’ resurrection then; and that when the women with spices arrived the recovered soldier guard had gone; and that, when all the women except Mary Magdalene were hastening back from the tomb to report the vision of the angels, “some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done.” Certainly, if the resurrection and accompanying events had happened shortly before sunset on Saturday, those frightened guards would not have waited till shortly before dawn of Sunday morning to go to the close-by city and report to their superiors.

• ³⁷ Moreover, the Jewish clergy had the guard stationed at the tomb because they charged Jesus with saying: “After three days I will rise again.” In which case the soldier guard would hardly have watched at the tomb Saturday night, for that would be the fourth night from Wednesday and would also be the beginning of the fifth day from any burial on Wednesday afternoon. Matthew 27:64 says the clergy commanded the tomb to be “made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away.” Therefore, if those guards were still on watch Saturday night, which the account shows that they were, then it must have been only the third day.

ANTITYPICAL FIRSTFRUITS

• ³⁸ God does not set aside his word unfulfilled. Among the things written aforetime that Jesus said must be fulfilled concerning himself is that at Leviticus 23: 5-11 as to the offering of the firstfruits of the barley harvest by the high priest, on Nisan 16, the day next after the sabbath that followed the passover. Since Jesus died as the antitypical passover lamb, and hence since his death must be on passover day, Nisan 14, his death could not have taken place on Wednesday and also match the prophetic shadow outlined at Leviticus 23. Why not? Because then the day next after the postpassover Sabbath would have been Friday, making it (till sundown) Nisan 16. On Friday, then, the priestly offering of the firstfruits of barley harvest would have had to be waved according to the Mosaic law. And to correspond, Christ Jesus would have had to be raised from the dead on that day as the firstfruits

• 37. According to the clergy's instruction regarding guarding the tomb, what further difficulty arises from the argument for a Wednesday-afternoon burial ?

• 38. How does the time-feature concerning offering up the firstfruits after passover also disprove a Wednesday-afternoon death and burial? unto God from the dead, “the firstfruits of them that slept.” But Jesus was not raised on Friday; he was resurrected early on the first day of the week, or on Sunday. The passover supper having been celebrated by him Thursday night and his death on the tree having followed at 3 p. m. of Friday, before Nisan 14 expired, then the third day therefrom (or Sunday before 6 p.m.) was the proper day (Nisan 16) for offering the barley firstfruits to God at the temple. That was the day for Jesus to be raised from the dead an immortal spirit.

” That day of offering the firstfruits, and likewise of Jesus’ resurrection, was also the day to begin counting to the feast of weeks, or Pentecost, fifty days thereafter. (Deut. 16:9-12) If Nisan 16 had fallen on Friday and the high priest offered up the firstfruits that day, then the law of Leviticus 23:15-21 required that the fifty-day count begin Friday, which would land the day of Pentecost on Friday. Even this would not be on the same weekday as those religionists claim Jesus was raised; and furthermore, it would be only 49 days, and not 50 days, from a Saturday resurrection. Such would mean, too, that Pentecost landed on the sixth day of the week, and not on the seventh day on which they insist Jesus was raised.

• ⁴⁰ In that case, also, the second firstfruits, or Pentecostal firstfruits, would not be offered up to God on the same day that the barley firstfruits were offered. All such is contrary to the infallible Scriptures. According to the rule, since the first day of the count to Pentecost was on the first day of the week, the fiftieth day would fall upon the same day of the week. Hence, since Christ Jesus was raised from the dead on the first day of the week as the “firstborn from the dead”, then on the first day of the week came the feast of Pentecost. Upon that feast-day the holy spirit of God was poured out upon the faithful disciples of Jesus at Jerusalem and the members of the “body of Christ” began to be offered up as a firstfruits unto God, pictured by the two leavened wheat loaves that the high priest waved before the Lord.—Acts 2.

• ⁴¹ The sacred Word of Jehovah God, therefore, stands vindicated. It is evident that when Jesus spoke of being “three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” he referred to three different days of the week, Nisan 14-16, or the sixth, seventh and first days, and not to a period of 72 hours or the equivalent of three full 24-hour days. In faithful fulfillment of the prophetic types, he died as God’s

• 39. What counting of days up to the next feast began to be made on Jesus' resurrecuon-day? and bow would a death and burial on Wednesday affect sucb counting and the day of the feast?

• 40 How would that affect the agreement between the weekday of first-fruits and that of Pentecost? and, Scripturally, on what day did Pentecost occur, and how was It marked?

• 41. (a) How. therefore, does God’s Word stand vindicated as to time of Jesus' entombment and the day of his resurrection’ (b) Despite others' having been awakened from the dead, bow was Jesus the first to be resurrected from the dead?

“Lamb” and was entombed on passover day, Nisan 14, on the sabbath day Nisan 15 he continued in the tomb, but on the third day, Nisan 16, the first day of the week, he was revived from the dead and he showed himself alive to his disciples. Unlike others that were temporarily raised from the dead and thereafter died again, "Christ, being raised from the dead, dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him” (Rom. 6:9) He is “alive for evermore”. (Rev. 1:18) He is indeed the first to be resurrected from the dead, and his resurrection is the beginning of “the first resurrection”.

ETERNAL LIFE REWARDS INTEGRITY

CAN Almighty God put on the earth men who, when subjected to the severest test put upon them at the hand of the adversary Satan, will maintain their integrity by remaining true and faithful to Jehovah God? That is the question raised by the wicked challenge of Satan long ago and restated at Job 2:1-6. Failure to maintain one’s integrity toward God means death, “everlasting destruction.” (2 Thess. 1:9; Matt. 25:46) Maintaining one’s integrity toward God means life. To understand and appreciate salvation to life, that question raised by the challenge of the Devil must always be kept in mind. If salvation were granted to man in the absence of the test, no opportunity would be afforded to prove the matter adequately and settle the question at issue.

It necessarily follows that Satan must have a free hand to put the test upon men. Since .imperfect men cannot successfully cope with Satan, it follows that such men must have some help. God has provided that needed help to be administered to men by and through Christ Jesus. But men who receive the same must do something in order to receive the provided help. God's requirement is that man must believe in the existence of the Almighty God, whose name is Jehovah; and such is the first step toward receiving help Man must believe that Jehovah God is supreme and holds the universal domination; that God is the “rewarder of them that diligently seek him”; and that he is the One who has provided salvation for man by and through Jesus Christ. If a man says, ‘I do not believe there is any Almighty God, who is the rewarder of them that diligently seek him/ that man has no faith and cannot please God and will not receive the provided help by and through Christ Jesus. (Heb. 11: 6) Or if that man says. ‘When I do what appears in my own eyes to be right, and I continue in that way, I think I shall be saved,’ that means that the man is without faith and cannot receive the provided help, and he puts himself in the class of the fool. (Prov. 12:15; Ps. 14:1) Likewise one who relies upon sentiment or feeling is void of understanding. Faith is the first essential to please God; and it is written in the Scriptures: “Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” (Rom. 10: 17) That means that one must be guided by the Word of God, and not by sentiment or by what some other creature may tell him. (Ps. 119:105) Then the question arises, In the many centuries that have eome and gone, who have believed? As expressed at Isaiah 53:1: “Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?”

In pronouncing sentence upon the rebellious man and woman at Eden God announced His purpose to raise up a Seed through his universal organization (God’s “woman”), which Seed in time would destroy “that old serpent”, Satan the Devil, and all his cohorts. Later God made promise that in that Seed so raised up all blessings should come to the human race. (Gen. 3:15; 12: 3; 22:18) The Scriptures set forth the overwhelming proof that such Seed of promise is Christ Jesus, the Lord or Savior, and the King of the New World, who shall rule it in righteousness at the command of the Almighty, Jehovah God. (Gal. 3: 16; Phil. 2:9-11; Isa. 32:1) Some persons have had full faith and confidence in the promise thus made by the Almighty God, as the facts and the Scriptures clearly show.

As individual persons are of small importance and classes of persons are made more prominent by the Word of Jehovah God, it is important for one to get into one of such classes. Jehovah has laid down his rules that relate to each class; and in His due time those who comply with his rules find a place in one of his provided classes. Consider now some classes of believers.

Abel is the first one named in the Scriptures as exercising faith in God. (Gen. 4:4; Heb. 11:4) In the eleventh chapter of Hebrews a list follows Abel in which are listed and named Enoch, Noah, Abraham, together with Sarah his wife, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and others, all of whom were in a class known as faithful men. Such men were counted righteous by reason of their faith in God and obedience to His commandments. It is written of those persons that they ‘looked for a city [a city symbolizing a government or kingdom] which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God”. Those men lived in the world of wickedness, surrounded by the servants of the Devil. But under those adverse conditions they had faith in Jehovah God and in his promise to set up a government of righteousness that would administer life and all attending blessings to them that serve and obey God. They believed God's promise that he would send the Messiah, or Christ, to save, to rule, and to bless, but just how He would accomplish that great work they did not know, because God did not reveal it to them.

Those persons were put to the most crucial tests, but none of such tests shook their faith in ‘God. The Devil saw to it that those persons were caused to suffer all manner of indignities, and the record in God’s Word concerning those faithful ones is that ‘they had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, bonds and imprisonment; they were stoned, and sawn asunder; of whom the world was not worthy’. (Hebrews chapter 11) Those men, because of their faith, obedience and faithfulness, constitute or form a class of faithful men, “just men,” who will be perfect in God’s due time. From Abel to John the Baptist that class of men were tested and proved their integrity toward God and received God’s approval; and of them it is written: "And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise. God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.”—Ileb. 11: 39, 40.

Why did that class of men end with John the Baptist? and why were not these men made perfect and given everlasting life at the time of receiving God’s approval? John the Baptist lived at the time when Jesus was on the earth, there being only six months’ difference between the birth of Jesus and that of John. He was the last of the prophets preceding the coming of the great Prophet of God, Jesus Christ. John died before the ransom price was paid by Jesus. He was the forerunner of Jesus and, by the grace of God, was made his announcer when he saw Jesus coming. He said: “Behold the Lamb of God, whieh taketh away the sin of the world.”—John 1: 29.

With the coming of Jesus came another class in Jehovah God’s arrangement. As of first importance Jesus came as the spokesman of Almighty God and as Vindicator of His holy name. The day of the other prophets had been filled, and concerning Jesus, in comparison with the prophets including himself, John said: “He must increase, but I must decrease.” (John 3:30) Jesus selected twelve men from among the Israelites, the covenant people of God. He specially taught them, and all of those apostles, except one, remained true and faithful to the Lord Jesus. Later Paul was made a disciple and apostle of Jesus Christ. Christ Jesus is the beginner, the head and the chief one of God’s capital organization called Zion. The faithful apostles and all who are made members of the capital organization of God are the others of His "elect” class The apostle is one of the elect class. Learning from the Lord that Christ Jesus and the members of his royal house must first be selected and perfected by Jehovah in carrying out His purposes, Paul wrote of and concerning the faithful men mentioned in Hebrews these words: “God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.” (Heb. 11:40) That is to say, the eleet company or class must first be perfected and gathered to Christ Jesus before those faithful men of old will be made perfect and granted life everlasting. Such is the purpose of God, and such he is carrying out.

The elect class of Jehovah God is Christ Jesus, the Head thereof, and the members of “his body ’, whieh is the church of God. (Eph. 1:22. 23) Because Christ Jesus is the Chief One and is the Vindicator of Jehovah’s name and Word, Jesus must be put to the test and maintain his integrity. Likewise all the members of “his body” must be put to the test and maintain their integrity toward God. All careful students of the Bible are familiar with the record of the cruel persecution that came upon Jesus at the hand and instance of the religionists, who were the agents of the Devil. (Matt 23:1-36; John 8:42-44) From the hour of being anointed with God's spirit after his baptism until his body hung limp upon the tree Jesus suffered all manner of contradiction of sinners and cruel persecution inflicted upon him by the enemies of God. All this was done at the instance of the Devil, and the religious leaders were the Devil’s chief instruments used. Because of his faithfulness to death and because he fully and completely maintained his integrity toward Jehovah God to the end, the Almighty God raised Jesus out of death and made him the King of the New World and the “Author of eternal salvation”, and exalted him to the highest place in the universe next to Jehovah himself.—Heb. 5:9; Phil. 2: 9-11.

Every one of the true followers of Christ Jesus has in like manner suffered persecution and indignities heaped upon them by the enemies of God, which visible enemies are the religionists who carry on the persecution of true Christians. Recognizing the necessity for such crucial test upon the followers of Christ, the apostle wrote: “For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps.” (1 Pet. 2:21) In support of that rule the apostle Paul adds his testimony: “[I] now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body’s sake, which is the ehurch.” —Col. 1:24.

Concerning the necessity of all of this elect class to be put to the test, it is further written: “It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: if we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us.” (2 Tim. 2:11, 12) Every member of the body of Christ must, under the test, maintain his integrity toward God; and to such, while undergoing the test, Jesus says: “Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.” (Rev. 2:10) Christ Jesus is the “faithful and true witness” of Jehovah, as he himself announces at Revelation 3: 14. He also declared he came into the world specifically to bear testimony to the truth and that every member of his body, that is, the elect class, must bear witness to the truth concerning the name and the kingdom of Jehovah God.—John 18: 37.

The chief doctrine set forth in the Bible is that concerning the vindication of Jehovah’s name. The kingdom of God under Christ is the instrument Jehovah uses to accomplish the vindication of His name. Hence the importance of the kingdom. Christ Jesus is the King, and he is ‘Head over the body, which is his church’. All the members thereof are to be made kings and priests unto God and of Christ. (Eph. 1:17-23) John, to whom the Lord gave The Revelation and the commission to record it, wrote: “And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.”—Rev. 1:5, 6.

Jehovah God made a covenant with Christ Jesus that Jesus should be the King and rule the world; and concerning this matter Jesus said to his faithful disciples: “Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations. And I appoint [I covenant] unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed [covenanted] unto me; that ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”—Luke 22:28-30; see Emphatic Diaglott.

The Devil at all times has attempted to destroy every one of those persons who have been called and selected to a place in the kingdom of heaven. This the Devil has done in his attempt to support his wicked challenge, and Jehovah has permitted the Devil to have a free hand in putting such tribulation upon God’s called ones in order that they might be tested and under that test they might prove their integrity. Such is the real reason why God permits the Devil's agents, the religionists, to persecute the anointed witnesses of Jehovah, the faithful followers of Christ Jesus. Their being persecuted is because they bear testimony to God’s name and to His kingdom.

Another class of believers and faithful ones is one that the Lord God has revealed from the Scriptures and brought to notice from and after A.D. 1918. After describing himself as the Good Shepherd of the “little flock” of elect ones, Christ Jesus went on to say : “And other sheep I have which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.” (John 10:16) Other scriptures show these latter words must apply at the “time of the end” before the battle of Armageddon which destroys the entire Devil’s organization. Such “other sheep” must therefore likewise undergo a test of their integrity before that battle, and they do. Though having no hopes of the heavenly kingdom, but entertaining only the prospects of life in human perfection under that kingdom, the “other sheep” must take their stand alongside of the present-day remnant of God’s elect ones and must engage in the Lord’s “strange work” of witness together and in unity with the remnant. So doing, they fulfill their vows of consecration of themselves to God and his will. They must keep their vows to God under the sore trials and tests that the Devil and his crowd bring upon all those who devote themselves to Jehovah God and the interests of his kingdom in these “perilous times” of the “last days”. By preserving their integrity toward God the same as do the remnant, not only will the “other sheep” gain eternal life on a Paradise earth, but members of this class may be hid in the day of God’s anger at Armageddon and may be borne alive through that battle into the postArmageddon New World and never descend into the grave; in a word, never die.

BARAK, VALIANT IN FIGHT

THE nations of earth are now locked in bloody conflict for world domination. From the battlefields comes the account of the exploits of fighting men. The press and radio herald their fame and deeds abroad, citing their achievements and heroisms, applauding their courage, and memorializing their names. The people are war-hero-conseious.

Mention of valiant fighters is not new, it is a centuries-old practice. And not always docs it promote hero worship. God's infallible Word, the Bible, the only reliable account of the origin and early exploits of man, sets forth many examples of valiant fighters, fighters for God’s righteous cause. So numerous, in fact, is this divinely approved group that the apostle Paul did not attempt to list all of them and their exploits: “Time would fail me to tell of Gedeon, and of Barak, and of Samson, and of Jephthae, of David also, and Samuel, and of the prophets: who through faith subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, waxed valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies of the aliens.”—Heb. 11: 32-34.

Why is Barak deserving of mention in this select list of warriors? Time and space in Paul’s letter to the Hebrews did not permit him to give the details, but in the Hebrew Scriptures of the Bible Barak's worthiness is disclosed. (Judges, chapters 4 and 5) He “waxed valiant in fight”, “subdued kingdoms,” and “turned to flight the armies of the aliens.” Does this mean he is to be lauded and worshiped as a hero? No; for it was not through his strength or inherent personal qualities or abilities that the victories came, but “through faith” in Jehovah, the God of righteous war, that these exploits were wrought. —Ex. 15:3, Am. Stan. Ver.

The Bible gives no information concerning the early life of Barak. The only portion of his entire life, for that matter, that is mentioned is the relatively brief period when he was used to deliver the Israelites from King Jabin. But this scanty account is very important, as it constitutes a prophetic drama. To appreciate the events that occurred the setting must be understood. Many years after Israel’s deliverance from King Eglon of Moab by Judge Ehud the children of Israel fell away to religion. So doing, they lost the Lord’s favor and protection and came under the harsh rule of Jabin, king of Canaan. For twenty years they suffered oppression from the hands of this heathen king and the captain of his hosts, namely Sisera.

The prospects of a successful uprising on the part of the Israelites were faint indeed. Sisera’s army boasted nine hundred chariots of iron, in addition to an unnumbered infantry force. Israel, on the other hand, had been almost totally disarmed by the religious, Devil-worshiping Philistines. There was hardly “a shield or spear seen among forty thousand in Israel”. (Judg 4:3; 5:8) It is estimated that the children of Israel numbered four million at this time, which would mean there were no more than one hundred shields and spears’at the most. They had no equipment to fight or throw off the oppressors. They did not have freedom from fear, and to avoid ill-treatment at the hands of Jabin’s gestapo the}’ shunned the highways and took byways They had ceased serving the Lord. Even worse, “they chose new gods.” With what result? Disunity, bickerings, strife and ‘war within the gates’ of their own organization. (Judg. 5:6-8) Religion had not unified the professed people of God. What they needed was ‘less religion’. So at this point the plight of Israel was dismal, yes, even hopeless, from the human viewpoint.

At this time of crisis Israel was judged by the prophetess Deborah. It is through a message of hers that the Bible character Barak is introduced into the account. The children of Israel had cried out to the Lord in their distress, and Deborah “sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam out of Kedesh-naphtali”. (Judg. 4:3-6) Kedesh was the northernmost of the six cities of refuge, was located in the territory of the tiibe of Naphtali, and very near to the city of Hazor, the home city of Jabin. Barak would have ample firsthand knowledge of the heathen king’s tyranny. The message from Deborah to him was that he go to Mount Tabor with ten thousand fighting men of Israel, and then Jehovah would draw unto him there Captain Sisera’s forces and deliver them into Barak’s hands.—Judg. 4:6, 7.

Barak’s answer to Deborah has been criticized by many Bible critics who lack understanding. He stipulated: "If thou wilt go with me, then I will go: but if thou wilt not go with me, then I will not go.” (Judg. 4:8) The critical ones claim that Barak was lacking in manliness, that he was weak and wanting in courage. Barak was not deficient in any manly qualities; moreover, he possessed that which his modern-day critics wholly lack, and that is an appreciation of Theocratic order and arrangement. In the first place, when the command to assemble troops came to him it was not orders from a woman that he was receiving. Deborah’s messenger said: “Hath not the Lord God of Israel commanded?” The order was from Jehovah; Deborah was just the channel He used. Barak heeded Jehovah’s prophetess.

So in making the provision that he did, that Deborah aeeompanj’ the Israelite forces in the field, Barak was not being weak and relying upon a woman. He was relying upon the Almighty. Deborah represented Jehovah in a special capacity, as a mouthpiece and prophetess, and her presence would assure Jehovah’s leading. Barak did not want to proceed without assurance that Jehovah would be with him. Remember the great difference between the two opposing armies, one highly mechanized for those times and the other poorly armed infantry, and that only a miracle could bring victory to Barak’s forces. He was not stubborn or fearful or superstitious; he just would not go unless the Lord’s blessing was sure. Deborah was the one Jehovah had used to give the initial orders; might she not be divinely used to give further orders from the Lord? Barak wanted to be sure and receive those instructions upon which victory would hinge. Thus God’s Word calling Barak “valiant” is true, though it makes liars out of presumptuous higher critics.—Rom. 3: 4.

In assenting to this proper request, Deborah added: “Notwithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honour; for the Lord shall sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.” (Judg. 4: 9) This did not cause Barak to hesitate or stumble; he was not ambitious to become a national hero. His burning desire was for Jehovah to be with him in the battle and grant the victory to His typical Theocracy. Neither was the journey to be for the personal honor of Deborah or Jael. Of the three, Barak is the only one given honorable mention in the eleventh chapter of Hebrews. No, not to the honor of any individual would the battle be, but to God and his organization or “woman” would the honor be. The victory song later sung gave credit where credit was due.—Judg. 5:2.

Barak sent out the call for the ten thousand. Not all of the tribes responded. The men of Naphtali and Zebulun came, accompanied by volunteers from the tribes of Ephraim, Benjamin, Manasseh, and Issaehar. The required army of ten thousand, all willing volunteers, took up its position on Mount Tabor. They did not have long to wait. True to his promise, Jehovah drew the enemy forces to the site of battle that he had selected. Up the valley stretching out below the heights of Mount Tabor the proud legions of Sisera came. Across the sandy plains and dry river bed of Kishon’s headwaters the nine hundred iron chariots rumbled. The faith of Barak and those with him would be sorely tested as they watched from their elevated position this overwhelming force being drawn up in battle array, and as they involuntarily made a mental comparison of it with their own insignificant troops. But Barak was not trusting in the arm of flesh. Through faith he subdued Jabin’s kingdom and turned to flight the alien armies of Sisera. (Heb. 11:32-34) How was the feat accomplished?

Orders from on high came to Barak, and through Deborah, thus vindicating his requirement of her presence. “Deborah said unto Barak, Up; for this is the day in which the Lord hath delivered Sisera into thine hand: is not the Lord gone out before thee? So Barak went down from mount Tabor.” (Judg. 4:14) Barak responded to the “Go ahead” signal coming through the Lord’s channel. Had not the invisible forces of Jehovah gone out before him ? Apparently the inanimate forces and elements had likewise been brought into play by this time. Seemingly the windows of heaven had been opened; a torrential downpour quickly swelled the heretofore dry Kishon into an irresistible flood. As Barak and his army marched down under cover of the storm, they could witness the tremendous havoc and confusion wrought by the unleashed fury of Jehovah of hosts. Barak’s men picked off the terrified, fleeing ones, none escaped. The name “Barak” means ‘lightning”, and like lightning this valiant fighter relentlessly pursued the Godless ones who had presumed to fight against God —Judg 4:16; 5:19-22.

Barak himself pursued Captain Sisera, who had taken to his heels when disaster threatened. The Kenite woman, Jael, ended his chase when she met him and said, “Come, and I will shew thee the man whom thou seekest ” Following Jael into her tent, there Barak saw Captain Sisera, dead, a tent-pin driven deep into his temple—Judg 4- 22

Thereafter Barak collaborated with Deborah in composing and singing the stirring victory song recorded at Judges chapter five. For the liberation and freedom brought to the typical free nation of Israel the composers of this sublime song gave Jehovah thanks and praise: “For freeing freemen in Israel, for a people willingly offering themselves, bless ye Jehovah. ... I sing praise to Jehovah, God of Israel.”—Judg. 5:2, 3, Young’s translation.

In this inspiring prophetic drama of vengeance and deliverance Barak pictured mainly Christ Jesus, sometimes as the Leader of the anointed remnant of God’s witnesses yet on earth, and sometimes as the Commander of the heavenly hosts who will march forth at Armageddon. None of the enemy will survive that battle, and the demonstration of Jehovah’s power through the use of the elements at that time will dwarf the cataclysm that struck down Sisera’s hordes at Kishon’s headwaters. Of the Greater Barak (“Lightning”) it is written: “As the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” (Matt. 24:27) Barak assembled the Israelite volunteers to Mount Tabor. Now the Greater Barak has assembled his followers unto the antitypical Mount Zion. (Rev. 14:1; Heb. 12:22, 23) They will valiantly follow him in the war against oppressing religion till the victory is won.

ARREST CREATES INTEREST (OHIO)

“Placing magazines on street corner I was placed under arrest. At police headquarters the chief told the arresting officer he could not arrest me. For about one hour I gave them a witness. The policeman apologized for bringing me in, and said the fathers of the town had ordered my arrest and, if he did not obey, he would lose his job. I told him if I did not obey the great Father Jehovah I would not only lose my job but lose my life. I used many scriptures to prove my point. They asked many questions. Said the officer: ‘I don’t know anything about the Bible, but this sounds very good. I am going to read this [the Watchtower and Consolation, also the new booklet I had given him].’ He guessed he had about enough for one day, and I could go now. I refused, and insisted he take me back where he found me. When we arrived at my corner there was a crowd there trying to find out why I had been taken in. Result was I placed seventy-two magazines in one hour.”

ENTERING A LARGE APARTMENT BUILDING

“I was accosted by the doorman, who asked whom I wished to see. I replied that I was one of Jehovah’s witnesses and my purpose was to call upon the tenants in the building. The doorman told me he was sorry, but he had received orders not to let any salesmen or solicitors go through the building. I replied: ‘I am a minister of the gospel, and am not a salesman or solicitor.’ He just barred my way, saying: ‘See the superintendent, and if he gives you permission to go through, it is all right with me.’ I asked: ‘Where is the superintendent?’ On being told I would find him in the basement, I went to look for him, but, not being able to find him, I left the building and went to work in another building near by. Next morning my partner and I again approached this same building. The same doorman was there. ‘Good morning,’ I said, ‘I came here yesterday with the intention of working this building, but you refused to let me through. Today we are here for the same purpose.’ He replied: ‘The superintendent is out at present. Why don’t you go and work some other building and then come back?’ We thanked him, knowing it would do no good to argue with him about entering the building. We went into the next apartment building, a twelve-story structure, stepped into the elevator, and asked to be taken up to the top floor. We began to witness, working our way down, finding a number of good-will people. At the ninth floor the elevator stopped, and the colored operator said in an angry tone of voice: ‘Here, Hiss, you can’t do this here. Come with me to the elevator!’ My partner refused, saying: ‘I am an ordained minister of the gospel and have the right to tell the people of God's kingdom.’ The elevator man stormed and threatened, saying he had orders from the superintendent and that no one was to go through the building. I replied: ‘In that case, report the matter to the superintendent.’ He did. Soon the elevator ascended and a man stepped out. 'Who are you people?’ He asked. We replied: ‘Jehovah’s witnesses.’ He said: ‘Oh, I see. You go right ahead. You are doing a good work. I have read some of your books, and I liked them.’ He accepted some of our literature and an invitation to our public lecture. Backing into the elevator, he smiled and said to my partner: ‘I am indeed sorry to have disturbed you in your work. Go right ahead.’ Soon the entire building was finished. As we passed through the lobby the elevator man apologized for having interfered with our work, and accepted some literature and bade us God-speed. We then returned to the first apartment building. The doorman recognized us and said the superintendent was in his office. He led the way, then stepped aside and listened. I rang the bell. After an exchange of ‘Good morning’, I said: ‘Sir, I called to see you yesterday, and again early this morning. We are Jehovah’s witnesses, and the purpose of our coming to this apartment is to work it from door to door with our Bible literature. Please understand, we have not come to ask your permission, but to ask your co-operation in this Christian work that we are engaged in.’ He replied: ‘Go right ahead. I have heard of you people and your Convention [August 20-22], and believe that you have a right to preach the gospel.’ He accepted some literature. The doorman also accepted some, and we proceeded to work the building and, by God’s grace, to offer food to the hungry and comfort those that mourn.”—New York.

SUPREME COURT DECISION PUSHED (ILLINOIS)

“In my door-to-door work in the foreign-literature testimony period I ran into-much trouble where the people are 95 percent Polish Catholic. While calling on one home in Calumet City I was told to let the people alone, for they were satisfied, and that the priest had told them not to read any of our books. I continued on and found a prospective ‘sheep’ in the next apartment. When returning to the street I was greeted with an angry mob of women, and a policeman, who wanted to know why I was there and who gave me permission to do this ‘peddling’. I answered-‘I am an ordained minister, and don’t need a permit to preach the gospel; you see I am not peddling.’ He said that if I expected to do this work here I would have to get a permit from the priest and the mayor. I explained that Jehovah is the only one whom we obey. I was put under arrest and taken to the police station. There I told them of the latest Supreme Court decision and that Calumet City is in the United States and the decision included them. To this they answered that they had their own laws and did not care about the Supreme Court. Later they told me that charges would be dropped if I would get out and not come back. I did not miss a chance to tell them that our company would be back to finish the city. Three days laier our [Hammond, Ind.] company went back in a group, fifty strong, placing much literature and finding many people of good-will. As my husband and I were working down one street the same cop that arrested me three days before came up, placed us under arrest and took us to the station, where the same officials demanded our permit to do this. Again we proved to them that we needed no permit, and if they continued to pick us up they would have to make a test case and bring the complainants out and have it settled once and for all to the satisfaction of the Supreme Court of our country. Finally they reluctantly gave up and took us back to our territory to resume witnessing.”—Pioneer.

s«